Actually, what I hate is when I leave my mobile phone at home all day, because that almost guarantees that someone will call me (and it won’t be someone out in Arizona with out-of-date records, trying to reach the person who had my number three years ago; seriously, this happens at least once a month). This time, it was the vet: Nigel’s biopsy results are back.
Of course, I didn’t get home until after the vet closed, so I’ll have to wait until tomorrow to call. Still, I’m trying not to freak out by reminding myself that the vet sounded upbeat in the voicemail. Surely, if it were really bad news — cancer or something — he would’ve used an appropriately solemn voice. At least, I hope so. . . .
Photo taken by Cindy Sheffield Michaels, who is obviously a much better photographer than I am.
In the meantime, Nigel seems to be doing pretty well, though his belly is still pretty bald from where they shaved him for the ultrasound. I tried to photograph the bald spot, but discovered that it was almost impossible to get a picture that was clear enough that you’d know what you’re seeing and get a feel for how very, very exposed his skin is, without at the same time giving you an eyeball full of his rather more personal bits. Not that I think Nigel would care, particularly, but posting shots of beagle tadger* just seemed a bit . . . much.
Anyway, unusually placed bald patches aside, he seems chipper enough. The only strange habit he’s developed lately involves his toy — currently, the brand-new electronic-sound-chipped frog I bought him last week. He’s always been wont to carry his toys with him on walks, and similarly likely to bay at other dogs he sees from a distance (otherwise, they may not notice him, you see?). The past couple of days, he’s started combining both activities into one: giving his, “Hello, I’m over here, do you see me?” bay while still holding the stuffed frog in his mouth. The toy acts as a kind of a mute, as for a trumpet, and the effect is just . . . bizarre.
Probably not diagnostically significant, though. At least, I hope not.
*** ***
*Much to my surprise, there is actually a fuel efficiency gadget out there called the Tadger; inexplicably, their FAQ does not address the first question that popped into my mind: why on earth would they name their product after a British slang term for an element of male anatomy? One might make the case that one of the charms of British English is its fondness for lots of different penile nicknames, making it difficult to find a product name that would not potentially evoke snickers; one might also be justified in noting that the Tadger (heh) product does at least appear to be cyclindrical, so maybe it was intentional; thirdly, one might also point out that the ToolTips box for the “Independent Testing” link on their Web page misspells it as “Independant” when you hover your mouse over the link, so who cares what they meant because they obviously can’t spell. (Go back.)