preraphaelitepunk.com

Authors and Subspecies Thereof

April 9th, 2007

Authors come in a wide variety of flavors. The most common is Artorius generis, of course, who is largely innocuous and mild-mannered; they get back to you, eventually, with answers to most of your questions, and when they override one of your edits, they do so with a modicum of grace (and sometimes even an explanation). They’re just people with jobs to do, and they recognize that you’ve got a job to do, as well; they seem to think, “It’s all good, I guess, but why bother to get excited about any of it?”*

Less common is Artorius angelius, who are responsive, thoughtful in their replies, and a sheer delight to work with because they realize that your job is to make their writing better (admittedly, sometimes for only a given value of “better,” such as making different people’s contributions to a group effort into something within spitting distance of stylistic cohesion). A. angelius can, many times, be recognized by their geek factor: regardless of what their area of specialty is, they instantly light up when you mention it — and if you express an interest in their pet subject, then they practically levitate with joy. They love what they do, they love talking and writing about it, and they will often call you up to chat about their thoughts on your queries, or even extend invitations for you to visit their research facilities if you’re ever in the neighborhood. They often even recognize and acknowledge the amount of work that their editors have put into a chapter — fact checking, math checking, and rewriting so that their words have as direct and immediate an impact as possible. They are darlings, one and all.

Then there is the thankfully rare subspecies Artorius mephitis snippiipantius, who appear to be convinced that their editors are meddling busybodies who exist only to thwart the authors’ brilliant and divinely inspired afflatuses (afflati? what is the correct plural? Merriam-Webster only defines the singular) by daring to touch their sacred words, which were accepted and approved for publication — albeit often by people who haven’t bothered to read the actual text with any level of criticality. They apparently think that editors exist only to run spellcheck, and then ship the files directly to the printer; they also seem to exist in a Bizarro-like world, in which redundancy is in fact merely a bare sufficiency, good chapter-writing and good speechwriting are exactly the same, and any statement of fact can be irrefutably contradicted by a simple incantation of the words, “No, it isn’t.” Any besmirchment of their words, any passing thought that you might not publish them in their virginal and untouched state, and a holy war is declared and all the high muckety-mucks get cc’ed on the flurry of e-mails of outraged virtues; to listen to them, editors are the centaurs, but in comparison to their manuscript’s fate, the Sabine women got off lucky.

Not that we have any of those sort, of course. ::cough cough:: Seriously, almost all of our authors range from “nice enough” to “absolute darlings,” but every single year, there’s at least one set who are just complete and utter hounds from hell. (Please note that, not being above ranting a bit myself, I do not include people who have heart attacks over something but then can be talked down off the ledge and made to see reason; these are people who get it fixed in their mind that editing is sacrilege and forever after will not agree with you if you say that, for instance, spinach is green or soap makes you clean. “What? Soap is the spawn of the devil! It tastes terrible, you can’t cook with it, and lather is Beelzebub’s sputum!”)

Artorius mephitis snippiipantius thankfully makes up only about 1 to 2% of our author base, but they are probably responsible for at least 90% of the insomnia and 95% of the premature aging of our editors.

*** ***

*The answer is that your editor remembers you, particularly if you’ve been a complete sweetheart or a complete stroppy pain in the ass (PITA). Assuming that your editor is not throwing his or her weight around and is willing to work with you, it strongly behooves you to be at least an Artorius generis or better, because you never know when you’ll need reprints sent to you on short notice; or research materials from 1963 located, scanned, OCRed, and e-mailed within a day; or a copy of the CD you worked on comped and overnighted to you because you’re working on a job in the Amazon and a giant snake just swallowed your only copy and you hadn’t installed it on your hard drive because the DRM wouldn’t let you. Nice authors get these things done for them promptly and with a big editorial smile, because we like you; grumpy-pants authors — well, they get the same things done for them, but more slowly, and with a helluva lot less efficiency and smiling. Plus, we’ll send that CD snail mail (bulk class) rather than overnight it.

2 Comments »

  1. Mark says

    Brilliant! Have yourself a Guinness!

    April 10th, 2007 | #

  2. Cindy says

    ah, i love reading your editing-related blogs! always very entertaining. :):)

    April 13th, 2007 | #

Leave a comment


RSS feed for these comments.