preraphaelitepunk.com

Still Here . . .

March 15th, 2006

. . . Just lazy and kind of boring. The most exciting thing that’s happened lately has been finally managing to unclog the slow drain in the bathtub. (Hey, I found that exciting. Being able to shower without sloshing around in ankle-deep water is a good thing, really. I should probably find some sort of strainer to keep hairs out of the drain. [Yes, this is how exciting my life has been lately. Aren't you glad I broke the silence to share that with you?])

There’s been an endless string of seitan stir-fries, Tofurky-slice sandwiches with sprouts, and hummus, none of which has been particularly Flickr-worthy. I have gotten to the point where I feel guilty inflicting yet another seitan-related photograph on hapless Flickrites, and because I have cooked nothing original or unusual in weeks, haven’t even put in much of an appearance there, either.

My theory is that my malaise comes from RSS overload. I’ve currently got something like 68 feeds going into my Bloglines page, some of which I read every day, some of which I tend to let accumulate until they reach overwhelming proportions and then either slog through dutifully or mark them all as read without really reading them. I really must cull some of them and move them to bookmark-only status or something, just to alleviate some of the weight pressing down on me. The veg*n blogs I read, and the few podcasts I have gotten around to downloading, are pretty much non-negotiable (though I may swap out my 30+ individual vegan food photo feeds for a single tag-word feed from Flickr, which would be simpler); Lifehacker[1] is similarly indispensible; Slashdot articles accumulate faster than lint in my drier (or hair in my shower drain), but I can usually skim through the headlines and easily pick out the ones I want to read, so I think I want to keep that. I think, though, that dear Gizmodo may be on its way out. Too many photos, too slow to load, overwhelming. Also, it makes me feel poor because I can’t afford the gadgets they highlight, which is just counterproductive. My PDA may be, what, three years old? It still works fine, thankyouverymuch, except for a slight tendency for the battery to drain at an alarming rate, so there’s no need for me to upgrade to the latest. There are probably a few other blogs that have too much psychic weight for me to carry around any more, too. If I can get the total number to less than 50, I think that would be a good start.

*** ***

[1] If I could give up Lifehacker, it would probably free me much more than getting rid of 10 other feeds, but it’s not going to happen. I lurrrrve LH, despite the fact that I tend to mark articles I don’t have time to deal with as “keep new,” and they accumulate at tachyon-like speeds. Just a couple of weeks ago, I got the number of kept-new down to under 100, but as of this moment I’m back up at around 125. Still, I cannot give it up. So many good things, not only for real life but also for work — I mean, what editor should be without a plugin like Bullfighter? (As long as no actual bulls were harmed in the programming, of course. :))

links for 2006-03-16

March 15th, 2006

Road Trip to Portland, Anyone?

March 2nd, 2006

From the Food Fight grocery store blog, details on an upcoming discussion on the “War on Terror” and its effects on free speech and dissent. Damn, I wish I could go, or get a transcript.

Good old Food Fight. Between them, Vegan Porn, NPR, and the BBC — with occasional side trips to CNN — all my media needs are satisfied. (No, Mark, with all due respect, I will not watch Fox News, because every time I surf past it that smug-looking twerp who does the editorials is on, and I find him maddeningly priggish. “Fair and balanced,” my posterior. I’d rather watch “The 700 Club,” which at least is good for incredulous and appalled laughter.)

Political Rant

March 2nd, 2006

(This will probably be choppy and disjointed, and really, really long, because several things have conspired this afternoon to freak me out, so please bear with me.)

The SHAC 7 were found guilty: see, for instance, here (via Sarah Kramer’s blog) and here (via the Food Fight blog). Damn. It’s been hard to assemble a reliable picture of what exactly happened, particularly because I’ve only been able to find a couple of sites presenting the government’s side, and those have seemed more interested in the economic effects of the protests than in anything else (see, e.g., this statement before Congress from October 2005). Most of what I’ve been able to find has been from veggie sites, AR sites, and unabashedly leftist papers. (If you don’t know me personally, please keep in mind that I am in fact what we jestingly call a pinko commie leftist bleeding-heart treehugging wishy-washy tax-and-spend liberal and quite proud of it, so when I refer to “unabashedly leftist” publications, that’s actually a good thing. If you do know me personally, then you already knew that and this little digression has bored the pants off you.)

According to the Kerrville Daily Times (second news link above), “The defendants were not accused of directly making threats or carrying out vandalism. Instead, they were charged with inciting the harassment with their Internet postings.” As far as I can tell, the defendants were targeted for posting their opinions, and for reporting on the actions of others — some of which do seem to me to be harassment and vandalism, but — and this is the important bit — harassment and vandalism are illegal, but do not equal terrorism.

(ObNote: I’m not in favor of harassment, threats, or vandalism, feeling that they do more harm than anything, and they are not the path I choose or endorse. Peace, understanding, respect, siblingly love, acceptance of others, yadda yadda yadda = good things. I do support freedom of speech, though, regardless of whether I agree or disagree with the points the speaker is making. Now back to incoherent rant.)

My understanding of the whole situation is imperfect, I admit. I sort of stumbled across this whole issue midway through. Obviously, I can’t go the original postings to form my own opinion, so it’s hard to know for sure.

The aforementioned government page nearly killed me when I read this: “Extremists are very knowledgeable about the letter of the law and the limits of law enforcement. The SHAC website has a page devoted to instructing activists on how to behave toward law enforcement officers, how to deal with interrogations, and what to say — and not say — if they are arrested.” How dare those wacky activists give helpful hints about how to avoid making things worse for yourself if you are arrested! How dare they actually inform people about their rights under arrest! You can’t seriously tell me that other groups of varying ilk don’t tell people who are going to a protest what to do if they’re arrested — I know that, when I went to protests against the first Gulf War back in college, we were certainly told to behave ourselves, disperse peacefully if ordered to do so, and not cause trouble — and not say anything without representation, to avoid causing unintentional problems — if we should chance to be arrested, and all we ever did was march around waving signs and chanting.

I’m rambling. I suppose my point is that I don’t believe the defendants were guilty of inciting terrorism — bad judgment, I’d say, in posting personal information about employees, and possibly endangerment after a certain point. Calling it inciting terrorism seems like a dangerous precendent: does any dissent become terrorism, then, especially if it causes economic distress? Why go after the Web site people, instead of trying to track down the people who are overzealous and doing the actual threats and stone-throwing and so on? (Still doesn’t seem like even that’s really terrorism to me — illegal and opprobrious, I would say, and not effective long-term [my opinion; feel free to disagree as you wish], but not terrorism.)

Being the pessimist that I am, I wasn’t really surprised by the verdict, though the more I thought about it, the more I realized that a little, tiny, almost nonexistent part of me was, actually. I’d figured they’d probably get nailed for something, but I suppose I hadn’t expected the charge of inciting terrorism to stick. I mean, it seems so ludicrous.

I got so out of sorts that I had to call my actual mother right after work, sitting in my car in the freakin’ parking lot at work, so we could rant to each other. She told me about a vocal critic of the war in Iraq who has been invited to speak at U.S. colleges — but has been repeatedly denied a visa, despite having been allowed by Blair into Britain. (I tried Googling to identify this person, but found several potential candidates; spoiled for choice, I gave up.) She also told me about climate change researchers who were given 72 hours to turn over copies of all their published works and raw data to the U.S. government. (I tried the Chronicle of Higher Education’s site for this; they’re subscriber-only, but going here should let you at least see I’m not making this up. I also found the tantalizing [also subscriber-only] article “Undercover Among the Cages” that has the most perplexing lead-in I’ve read in ages: “Kate Turlington’s co-workers in the animal laboratory grew suspicious when they noticed that she never ate meat at lunch.” WTF?)

As a topper, I was just parking outside my building this evening when NPR announced that the Senate had renewed the Patriot Act. Agreement still must be reached with the House, but this news on top of everything else nearly made me start sobbing into my steering wheel.

I haven’t been terribly politically active for years; I found myself getting discouraged and then outright depressed, in a clinical sort of fashion. Eventually, I decided I couldn’t handle taking it so seriously, and forced myself to back off, but today has just made me want to do something about the way the country seems to be going. I told myself that everything goes in cycles and things will even out in the long run, but it feels like things are going too far, and it’s getting scary.* My mom suggested that I volunteer for political candidates, stuffing envelopes or something, but that won’t be possible really for, what, another year? I looked for some sort of Baking Against Bush Bake Sale that I could volunteer for, but wasn’t able to find anything, really. There’s got to be something around here somewhere: something I could do so I wouldn’t feel so powerless. (Given that last month, for the very first time ever, I got eight hits from government domains, I feel I should perhaps be more specific: the things I have in mind are no more radical than perhaps carrying a sign in a peaceful demo, or the aforementioned bake sale. We’re not talking property damage, or even rudeness: at worst, we’re talking perhaps a slightly tiresome and off-key sing-song of “Blowin’ in the Wind.”)

This post has taken me almost three hours to put together. Funny, that. You’d think it would’ve been more coherent, but there you go.

*** ***

*Note to Mark: Feel free to roll your eyes at this. I won’t hold it against you.

« Previous Page